Most companies have a plan and call it a strategy. The mix-up is expensive: plans and strategies answer different questions, fail differently, and need different inputs.
A business plan answers: given what we do, what will next year look like? It extrapolates — from last year’s revenue, the current team, the existing product. Planning is arithmetic with ambition, and there is nothing wrong with it. You cannot run a company without a budget and an operating plan.
But a plan takes direction as an input. It cannot create one. When a company tries to plan its way out of a strategic question, the result is a budget in a costume: precise numbers pointed at an unexamined direction.
A growth strategy answers the prior question: of the places we could go, which one — and what do we give up to get there? It works with alternatives, trade-offs and evidence. It produces direction; the plan then makes that direction operable.
One more asymmetry: a plan fails visibly and quickly — you miss the number by March. A strategy fails quietly and slowly — you hit the number for two years while the market moves underneath you. That is why strategies deserve more scrutiny than plans, not less.
The practical version of this distinction is how we run growth strategy engagements: choice first, roadmap second, budget third.
We use cookies to analyse traffic and improve the site. Analytics is enabled only with your consent. Cookie Policy