Board pressure, a vendor deck for every meeting, an intern who "automated" something last month — while the actual question goes unanswered: where, in this specific business, does AI change the P&L, and where is it theater with a demo?
Workstream 01
Where AI touches revenue, cost and risk in your specific operations — process by process, not department by department.
Workstream 02
The top five to ten use cases ranked by payback and execution load — plus an honest list of what not to do.
Workstream 03
For each use case: build, buy, or wait for the market. Most "AI projects" should have been a subscription.
Workstream 04
Data boundaries, human sign-off, vendor terms — and a pilot that proves value before anything scales.
The engagement ends with a scale decision made on pilot numbers — not on vibes, and not on a demo.
Not a vision: a roadmap with owners, metrics and a scale decision made on pilot numbers. One use case proves value first; the rest of the portfolio waits its turn — or gets cut.
No. We're vendor-neutral: our fee doesn't change based on the answer.
If that's the finding, we'll say it. But in most engagements the payback is in cycle time and quality, not in headcount.
The rules on our AI infrastructure page apply doubly to yours: controlled environments, no training on your data, named human accountability.
Honest answer: under a couple of dozen people, most of the value is in off-the-shelf tools used well, not in custom AI. We say so, help you pick, and don’t sell you a transformation you don’t need.
We work with them, not around them. The audit, the priorities and the pilots are designed so your team can own what production becomes.
Then we killed one bad idea cheaply. That is the system working.
The opportunity map is a two-week sprint.
We use cookies to analyse traffic and improve the site. Analytics is enabled only with your consent. Cookie Policy